In the age of constant digital transformation, the way we build our software systems is evolving faster than ever. Companies are looking for more flexible, scalable, and robust solutions to meet their growing demands.
One such solution is Event-Driven Architecture (EDA), a software design approach that is shaping the way modern applications are built, though not the only one with such capabilities.
But what does EDA mean in practice for the world of software development?
In this article, we will understand how it works, its advantages, and also how it differs from other software architectures. Enjoy!
What is event-driven architecture?
Event-driven architecture is a software design model that emphasizes producing, detecting, and reacting to events. An “event” is an action or a significant state change that occurs within a system, whether it’s a click, payment processing, or pop-up display.
In practice, the event — within the context of the system — means that something has happened in the software. These events can exist throughout the system, without necessarily interacting with each other, which generates several benefits.
How does event-driven architecture work?
Imagine an e-commerce app. When you make a purchase, several “events” are triggered. Your payment is processed, inventory is updated, and a confirmation email is sent to the customer. Each of these actions is an event.
In this sense, there are event producers—the components that perform the action or state change—and the event consumers, who are interested in that action or change. These two are usually uncoupled, meaning they don’t need to know anything about one other.
The organization process of all this is quite simple: the events are placed on an “event bus” and consumed by the interested components. The bus works as a mail service that takes notifications from producers to consumers.
What are the advantages of using EDA?
EDA has several advantages that make it an attractive option for many applications. Here are some of them:
- Decoupling: Because event producers and consumers are decoupled, this provides greater flexibility for the application to function. Components can be changed, upgraded, or replaced independently. In the example of e-commerce, the team that takes care of payment processing can update its system without interrupting the team responsible for sending emails;
- Scalability: EDA can easily handle large, high-demand workloads. If, in our e-commerce example, there is a sudden increase in purchases (as over events such as Black Friday), the system can handle this by creating more event consumers to handle the extra workload;
- Resiliency: Event architecture is resilient to failures. If a component fails, it can be restarted or replaced without affecting the rest of the system—similar to the decoupling mentioned earlier;
- Real-time action: Another advantage of the EDA approach is the quick reaction to events. Think of a traffic monitoring system that reacts instantly to changing road conditions. This is how event-driven architecture works: with instant executions from event producers to their consumers.
Take the chance to also read: IT Certification: What Is It and How Does It Work? Is it worth it? Find out!
Difference from Event-Driven Architecture to Other types of Architecture
Now that you know what event-driven architecture is, how it works, and also its advantages, let’s understand its differences from other widely used architecture types:
Event-Driven Architecture vs. Monolithic Architecture
In monolithic architecture, the entire software system is built as a single cohesive component—one big block, so to speak.
Therefore, any decoupling is minimal, which means that any change in one part of the system may require changes in other parts as well. At this point, as we have seen, EDA operates independently, both in development and production.
Event-Driven Architecture vs. Service-Oriented Architecture
Service-oriented architecture is premised on organizing software as a set of autonomous services. They interact with each other in order to perform specific tasks, being coupled at some level, because one service needs to know how to invoke another service in order to perform an operation.
EDA, on the other hand, is based on the production, detection, and reaction to events. Instead of actively invoking other components in order to do something (as in service architecture), components in EDA produce events that other components passively consume.
In summary, the level of decoupling and the way the components interact are the great highlights of EDA. This can lead to systems that are more scalable, robust, and flexible, as well as simpler to manage during development.
It is important to emphasize that choosing event-based architecture does not solve the problems of creating and managing software. In this sense, there is no “silver bullet” that will magically make programming simpler.
Therefore, each team needs to analyze whether this approach is the best fit for the current project at hand. However, in several cases, opting for the monolithic or service-oriented system may be the best way out.
Do you like the content? So, take the opportunity to also read: Software Architecture Patterns: What They Are, Advantages, Disadvantages and Use Cases
